{"id":897,"date":"2024-04-08T17:33:40","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T17:33:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897"},"modified":"2024-04-09T05:32:54","modified_gmt":"2024-04-09T05:32:54","slug":"kerala-versus-union-dispute-lingers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897","title":{"rendered":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

The dispute between the State of Kerala and Union of India involving disagreement on the latter\u2019s scope of power to restrict debt levels of the former, was referred to a Constitution Bench by the Supreme Court. Previously, I\u2019ve written<\/a> about the dispute, likely issues, and interpretive questions that Kerala\u2019s petition is likely to raise. In this article, I comment on the Supreme Court\u2019s latest order<\/a> where it has summarized the arguments raised by both Kerala and the Union of India and enlisted the issues involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summary of Arguments <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The overarching issue, to recall briefly, is that under Section 4, Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 the Union is obligated to ensure that total debt of the Union and State Governments does not exceed 60% of Gross Domestic Product (\u2018GDP\u2019) by end of the Financial Year 2024-25. In a letter dated March 27, 2003 the Union imposed a \u2018Net Borrowing Limit\u2019 on Kerala and the flashpoint is that the Union included the borrowings of State-owned enterprises in the limit, a move Kerala views as unconstitutional and unprecedented intrusion on its borrowing powers.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kerala\u2019s arguments inter alia included that under Article 293 of the Constitution, the Union cannot impose conditions on all loans of a State government, but only on loans sought by the Union; second, liabilities of State-owned enterprises cannot be included in the borrowing limit. Kerala made two additional arguments, which prima facie seem contradictory. As per Kerala if it has underutilized the borrowing limit in the previous years, it should be allowed to use it in the current year while if it has over-borrowed in the previous years before Financial Year 2023-24, it cannot be adjusted against the net borrowing limit of the current Financial Year. A joint reading of the latter two arguments makes it seem that Kerala wants the benefits of under borrowing, but no hazards of over borrowing. Though the true import of the arguments may play out in full detail in the Court at a later stage and I discuss one further aspect of these arguments below. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Union\u2019s response was to categorise the dispute under the broad umbrella head of public finance and argue that the fiscal health of India will be in jeopardy if Kerala is allowed to borrow beyond its ceiling limit. And that the Union\u2019s determination of the ceiling limit by including loans of State-owned enterprises in the limit is precisely to prevent State\u2019s from bypassing the ceiling limit imposed under FRBM Act, 2003. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A preliminary survey of the arguments as summarized by the Supreme Court suggests that Kerala is trying to keep the dispute closer to the scope of Article 293, persuade the Court to adopt a narrow reading of the provision, and thereby preserve its right to borrow more money. The Union, on the other hand, has suggested that the issue is more proximate to the national debt management, public finance, and perhaps overall management of the economy. By suggesting that the larger issue of national finance and economy is involved, the Union gets to suggest that it has a pre-eminent power to regulate the economy and State\u2019s rights should cede in favor of nationwide economic management. The legal issue that should cut across is that the Union\u2019s power to regulate economy cannot traverse beyond the Constitutionally allocated powers. The Union\u2019s power to regulate economy is not an all-pervasive power. Every power must be traced to a Constitutional provision and the Supreme Court will have to determine the outer limit of such power, which in the absence of any precedents is a tough ask.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Littany of Issues <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court in its impugned order enlists certain \u2018corollary\u2019 questions that arise from Kerala\u2019s petition and impact the fiscal federal structure envisaged under the Constitution. Some of these questions include: Whether fiscal decentralization is an aspect of Indian federalism? What are the past practices relating to regulating borrowing of the States? And whether they can form basis of legitimate expectations of the States? Whether the restrictions imposed by the Union in conflict with the role assigned to the Reserve Bank of India as manager of public debt of the State? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The foundation question, from a constitutional law standpoint is: whether fiscal decentralization is an aspect of Indian federalism? Indian federalism, relating to economic relations of the Union and States has, for decades, largely revolved around allocation of taxation powers and rarely on public debt management. This is perhaps because the latter has never been the site of contestation or because it has not been vital to the federal relations. Supreme Court\u2019s framing of the question is interesting as the query is does not relate to allocation of powers on public debt but whether public debt can be viewed as part of fiscal federalism. And if the answer is yes, what are the implications? Again, questions that may not have easy answers. Public debt is managed by various <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court also framed other questions such as: Does Article 293 of the Constitution vest a State with an enforceable right to borrow money from the Union and\/or other sources? Whether borrowing by State owned enterprises can be included in scope of Article 293(3) of the Constitution? Answering all these questions will require an inquiry into intent of the Constituent Assembly, past practice, and their relevance to the current dispute.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the Supreme Court may have termed the above questions as corollary, I doubt they are likely or should be viewed as corollary. Perhaps the questions are incidental to the immediate dispute at hand, but certainly not from the standpoint of constitutional law. Corollary or principal questions, the Supreme Court has acknowledged that since Article 293 has not been the subject of an authoritative interpretation by the Supreme Court, all the questions fell within the scope of Article 145(3) of the Constitution and should be decided by a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Injunction is Ousted <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kerala pleaded for a mandatory injunction and requested that the Union should undo the imposition of net borrowing ceiling limit and restore the position that existed before imposition of the limit. The Supreme Court denied Kerala the injunction by agreeing with the Union\u2019s argument on overutilization. As per the Supreme Court, Kerala\u2019s argument that over borrowing in certain financial years is irrelevant once the net five-year period of a successive Finance Commission commences is not prima facie convincing. The Union\u2019s argument was that if Kerala or any other State over borrows during certain financial years, then the borrowing ceiling can be adjusted in subsequent financial years even if the subsequent financial years are within the 5-year period of a new Finance Commission. In the impugned case, Kerala\u2019s argument that both underutilization and overutilization of borrowing limit has to be made within the 5-year period of a Finance Commission was based on its reading of select paragraphs of the Finance Commission reports<\/a>. For example, the 15th <\/sup>Finance Commission specifically stated that the adjustments can be made \u2018within our award period\u2019. (para 12.64) But, whether the 15th<\/sup> Finance Commission meant that adjustments can be made \u2018only\u2019 within its award period is not clear. To be sure, the Supreme Court has only made prima facie determination in favor of the Union and refused to grant Kerala an injunction. But, whether the refusal of injunction would cause irreparable harm to Kerala will be known in the future.     <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

While hitherto our understanding and framing of Union-State economic relations has only centred around the issues of taxation, the issue of public debt has remained dormant and outside the lens of law. This case presents an opportunity to understand the statutory framework on public debt in tandem with the constitutional framework, and by extension the nature of State\u2019s right to raise money from the market including whether Courts understand the power of a State to raise money as a right itself. Equally, this case may determine if the term fiscal federalism can encompass public debt in its scope. Finally, it is worh seeing if the Courts adopt an approach of deference, a well-entrenched judicial approach on all matters of taxation law. Or will it treat economic management, nationwide economic interests as justification in themselves and excuse itself from examining the underlying constitutional issues in a significant and meaningful manner.     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The dispute between the State of Kerala and Union of India involving disagreement on the latter\u2019s scope of power to restrict debt levels of the former, was referred to a Constitution Bench by the Supreme Court. Previously, I\u2019ve written about the dispute, likely issues, and interpretive questions that Kerala\u2019s petition is likely to raise. In this article, … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":898,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[137],"tags":[155,157,156,94,32],"class_list":["post-897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-there-are-two-certainties-in-life-taxes-and-complaints-about-taxes","tag-constitution","tag-kerala","tag-public-debt","tag-ravpratapsingh","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The dispute between the State of Kerala and Union of India involving disagreement on the latter\u2019s scope of power to restrict debt levels of the former, was referred to a Constitution Bench by the Supreme Court. Previously, I\u2019ve written about the dispute, likely issues, and interpretive questions that Kerala\u2019s petition is likely to raise. In this article, ... Read more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rav Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rav Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Rav Singh\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e\"},\"headline\":\"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897\"},\"wordCount\":1422,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Constitution\",\"Kerala\",\"Public debt\",\"RavPratapSingh\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Two Certainties\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897\",\"name\":\"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?p=897#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/\",\"name\":\"TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum\",\"description\":\"Analyse. Discuss. Learn.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e\",\"name\":\"Rav Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rav Singh\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ravsingh.in\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/theleagle.in\\\/?author=2\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum","og_description":"The dispute between the State of Kerala and Union of India involving disagreement on the latter\u2019s scope of power to restrict debt levels of the former, was referred to a Constitution Bench by the Supreme Court. Previously, I\u2019ve written about the dispute, likely issues, and interpretive questions that Kerala\u2019s petition is likely to raise. In this article, ... Read more","og_url":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897","og_site_name":"TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum","article_published_time":"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00","author":"Rav Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rav Singh","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897"},"author":{"name":"Rav Singh","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/#\/schema\/person\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e"},"headline":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0","datePublished":"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897"},"wordCount":1422,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg","keywords":["Constitution","Kerala","Public debt","RavPratapSingh","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Two Certainties"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897","url":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897","name":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0 - TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg","datePublished":"2024-04-08T17:33:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-09T05:32:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/#\/schema\/person\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Religious-Beliefs-and-Income-tax-AT-ODDS-7-pdf.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?p=897#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala versus Union: Dispute Lingers\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/#website","url":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/","name":"TheLeagle | Eco Law Forum","description":"Analyse. Discuss. Learn.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/#\/schema\/person\/1ded6db9ab6793d2bfd57d3237c2e09e","name":"Rav Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88a0d335c97cf709c9618d1d1c19ff328612a3144c986c21e6756b1e84bc15e5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rav Singh"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.ravsingh.in\/"],"url":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/?author=2"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=897"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":900,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897\/revisions\/900"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theleagle.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}