Indirect Tax
-
Patna High Court Directs Substantive Compliance with Section 129, CGST Act, 2017
Short Note In a concise judgment[1], a Division Bench of the Patna High Court provided relief to a taxpayer who was made liable under Section 129, CGST Act, 2017 for transporting goods on an expired e-way…
-
Provisional Attachment under GST: Bombay HC Clarifies Scope of Section 83
Introduction In a judgment[1] pronounced on 30.06.2023, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court interpreted the law on provisional attachment under GST. While the law on provisional attachment has been sufficiently elaborated by the Supreme Court…
-
Limits of Deeming Fiction: Intermediaries under GST – II
Constitutionality of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2), IGST Act, 2017 Introduction As elaborated in the first of this two-part post, the constitutionality of Section 13(8)(b), IGST Act, 2017 has attracted varied judicial opinions that deploy superficial…
-
Time Period for Filing Appeals under GST: Kerala HC Adopts Strict Interpretation
Short Note In a concise judgment[1], the Kerala High Court dismissed writ petition of a taxable person and held that an appeal under CGST Act, 2017 must be filed before the appellate authority in a time…
-
Uncertain Purchaser Obligations under GST: ITC Claims Hit a Roadblock
On 12.06.2023, the Calcutta High Court pronounced a judgment[1] urging the Revenue to thoroughly review the petitioner’s supporting documents before rejecting its ITC claim. In the impugned case, the Revenue disallowed the petitioner’s ITC claim because the…
-
Limits of Deeming Fiction: Intermediaries under GST-I
Constitutionality of Section 13(8)(b), IGST Act, 2017 Introduction Constitutionality of Section 13 (8)(b), IGST Act has attracted the attention of different Courts. The reason for suspect constitutionality of Section 13 (8)(b), IGST Act is that incorporates…
-
Budgetary Support Scheme: High Court Interprets Eligibility Criteria Strictly
Budgetary Support Scheme (‘BSS’) was introduced by the Union of India (‘Union’) for taxpayers to smoothen their transition to GST. Taxpayers who received concessions or exemptions under the pre-GST indirect tax regime would cease to receive…
-
Patna High Court Prevents Levy of Entertainment Tax Citing 101st Constitutional Amendment
A Division Bench of the Patna High Court on 18 May 2023 pronounced a judgment that inter alia required it to examine the interaction of Bihar Entertainment Tax Act, 1948 (Act of 1948) with the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act,…
-
Revenue Misinterprets Jurisprudence on Game of Skill: Kar HC Introduces Sanity Through Gameskraft Judgment
On 11 May 2023, a Single Judge Bench of the Karnataka High Court delivered a judgment in the Gameskraftcase[1] deciding that the actions of the Revenue Department against online intermediary company, M/s Gameskraft Technologies Pvt Ltd (‘GTPL’) had…
-
Refunds for Zero-Rated Exports Viewed as Fundamental to GST Regime
In a judgment pronounced on 16 February 2023, a Single Judge Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Tonbo Imaging India case[1] held that Rule 89(4)(C), CGST Rules, 2017 ‘is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational, unfair, unjust and ultra vires Section 16…
