RavPratapSingh
-
Bombay HC Allows Taxpayer to Claim Benefit of DTVVA, 2020
In a recent judgment[1], the Bombay High Court allowed the taxpayer to claim benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (‘DTVVA, 2020’) and held that the interpretation adopted by the Revenue in deciding the…
-
Bombay HC Allows Petitioner to Claim Benefit of Section 54(F), IT Act, 1961
In a lucid judgment[1], the Bombay High Court allowed petitioner to claim benefit of Section 54(F), IT Act, 1961 and held that the amendment made to the impugned provision by virtue of Finance Act, 2014 was…
-
Kerala HC Accepts Taxpayer’s Plea Against Denial of ITC
In a crisp judgment[1], the Kerala High Court has held that Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) cannot be denied to a taxpayer merely because the tax paid is not reflected in GSTR-2A. The Kerala High Court’s conclusion…
-
Patna High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 16(4), CGST Act, 2017
In a recent judgment[1], the Patna High Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 16(4), Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘CGST Act’) and Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Section 16(4), as it stood…
-
Sikkim High Court Strictly Interprets Eligibility Criteria for Budgetary Support Scheme
In an interesting judgment[1], the Sikkim High Court interpreted eligibility criteria for the budgetary support scheme (‘BSS’) and denied petitioners BSS benefit because of change in ownership and constitution of the relevant business units. The petitioners…
-
Delhi High Court Opines Allows Investigation Against Petitioner under GST: Refuses Reliance on Section 6(2)(b), CGST Act, 2017
In a recent judgment[1], the Delhi High Court interpreted the term ‘intelligence-based enforcement action’ and denied the petitioner’s prayer to stop investigation by multiple investigating agencies. The High Court held that merely because certain authorities took…
-
CA Firm Cannot Invoke MSME Act Against the Income Tax Department
In a unique case[1], the Delhi High Court adjudicated that a Chartered Accountancy firm (‘CA firm’) cannot invoke the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (‘MSME Act’) for fees payable to it for Special…
-
Fake Invoices are ‘Economic Offences’: Delhi High Court Denies Bail
Introduction In a recent judgment[1], a Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court denied bail to the Chartered Accountant (‘CA’) of the complainant. The latter had filed FIR and alleged that he had appointed the…
-
Patna High Court Castigates Tax Officer for Recovering Tax Illegally
In a recent judgment[1], the Patna High Court has castigated a tax officer for effecting a tax recovery and ignoring the legislative mandate. Section 78, CGST Act, 2017 allows for recovery of tax from taxpayers within…
-
Madras High Court Holds that Credit Note Not Required When No Delivery of Goods
In a recent judgment[1], the Madras High Court held that there is no requirement to issue a credit note when the goods were returned to the seller without delivery to the buyer. The High Court held…
