GST
-
Allahabad HC Quashes Letter Issued by YEIDA Demanding Payment of GST
Allahabad High Court recently allowed a writ petition[1] and quashed a letter issued by the Advisor to Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) requiring the petitioner to pay GST of 18% on the premium of Rs 3.80…
-
Allahabad HC Opines on Section 129, CGST Act, 2017
In a recent case[1], the Allahabad High Court has reiterated an essential condition to invoke Section 129, CGST Act, 2017, i.e., an intention to evade tax. While a similar observation has been made by Supreme Court…
-
Gujarat AAAR Disallows ITC on Mandatory CSR: Provides Superfluous Reasoning
Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (‘Gujarat AAAR’) in a recent ruling[1] has concluded that the applicant was not allowed to claim ITC on inputs and input services for mandatory expenditure made in pursuance of Section 135,…
-
Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Order Denying ITC
In a recent judgment[1], the Calcutta High Court set aside the order of the Revenue Department wherein the ITC of assessee was disallowed on the ground of mismatch in GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. While Courts have, of late,…
-
Kerala HC Holds ITC Cannot be Denied Due to Difference in GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B
In a recent judgment[1], the Kerala High Court has aligned with an emerging jurisprudence wherein the High Courts have held that under the GST regime a taxpayer’s ITC cannot be denied merely on ground of difference…
-
Andhra HC Sets Aside SCN: Holds that it is Vague and Dubious
The Andhra Pradesh High Court in a recent judgment[1] set aside the showcause notice (‘SCN’) issued by the Revenue Department on the ground that the SCN was vague and dubious. The High court held that the SCN…
-
Understanding Orissa High Court’s Judgment in Safari Retreats Case
This post is an attempt to understand the Orissa High Court’s judgment in Safari Retreats case.[1] While the judgment was pronounced by the High Court in April 2019, its current relevance stems from the appeal against the judgment being…
-
Delhi High Court Orders Refund of Illegally Collected GST
The Delhi High Court in a recent order[1] followed the Gujarat High Court’s judgment in M/s Cosmol Energy Private Limited case[2] wherein it held that Section 54, CGST Act, 2017 is not applicable for illegally collected GST or GST paid…
-
Gujarat HC Quashes SCN for Lack of Reasons and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice
Gujarat High Court has in a recent judgment[1] quashed a showcause notice (‘SCN’) and the subsequent order on the ground that the reasons for cancellation of the assessee’s registration are not decipherable. The High Court also added…
-
Namma Yatri App Qualifies as e-commerce operator, but not Supplier of Services
In a recent ruling[1], Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (‘AAR’) made an interesting pronouncement where it held that the applicant in question only satisfied the definition of e-commerce operator under Section 9(5), CGST Act, 2017, but…
