GST
-
Whose Money is it? Madras HC Says Deposit of Cash Amounts to Payment of GST
The Madras High Court, in a recent decision, observed that the money in Electronic Cash Ledger (‘ECL’) of the taxpayer belongs to the exchequer since the money was deposited in the name of the exchequer in the…
-
Section 16, CGST Act is Constitutional: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court recently[1] dismissed a taxpayer’s challenge that Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, 2017 were violative of Article 14 and unconstitutional. The High Court ruled that the taxpayer’s challenge was vague, and the impugned provisions did not…
-
Jharkhand HC Allows State Authorities to Continue Proceedings, Rejects DGGI’S Arguments on Nationwide Fake ITC Fraud
The Jharkhand High Court recently adjudicated a writ petition where the petitioner had argued that only the authority which had initiated the entire process of investigation can complete the modalities and any subsequent actions by other authorities need…
-
An Ambiguous Circular: Is Electricity Indirectly under GST?
On 31.10.2023, CBIC issued a Circular clarifying the applicability of GST on certain services. The Circular, inter alia, clarified one issue which is the focus of this article. The issue, as framed by the Circular, was: Whether GST is…
-
ITC Can be Denied if Delay in Filing Returns: Cal HC
The Calcutta High Court recently decided the question whether an assessee filing its tax returns after the stipulated time – prescribed under Section 16(4), CGST Act, 2017 - is entitled to claim ITC. The High Court answered in…
-
Allahabad HC Clarifies Govt’s Scope of Power under Section 3 and 5, CGST Act, 2017
In a recent decision[1], the Allahabad High Court interpreted Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, 2017 and clarified the scope of power of the Central Govt and the CBIC under these provisions. Section 3…
-
Appellate Authority Ignored CBIC’s Circular: Bombay HC
In a recent decision[1] the Bombay High Court expressed surprise that the appellate authority ignored CBIC’s Circular while ordering the assessee to pay back the Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) refund granted to it along with interest. The…
-
Madras HC Holds Prescribed Time Period for Filing Returns as ‘Directory’: Interprets Section 62, CGST Act
In a recent decision[1], the Madras High Court had to decide if an assessee loses the right to file tax returns after expiry of 30 days under Section 62(2), CGST Act, 2017. Section 62(2) provides an assessee 30…
-
Supreme Court Reduces Penalty under Section 129, CGST Act: Clarifies that Decision is Not a Precedent
Supreme Court in a recent case[1], directed that the penalty imposed on the assessee for transporting goods without a valid e-way bill should be reduced by 50%. While the Calcutta High Court had upheld the levy…
-
Pre-Deposit Under CGST Act Does not Include Penalty and Fee: Kar HC
The Karnataka High Court in a recent decision[1] interpreted Section 107, CGST Act, 2017 and adopted a literal interpretation of Section 107(6)(b) to hold that it only mentions that the remaining amount of tax in dispute needs…
