RavPratapSingh
-
Fee Attributable to Transmission of Non-Live Feed Not Royalty: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court in a recent decision[1] held that the fee attributable to ‘non-live’ feed cannot be categorized as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961. The High Court relied on the observations in Delhi…
-
Section 16, CGST Act is Constitutional: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court recently[1] dismissed a taxpayer’s challenge that Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, 2017 were violative of Article 14 and unconstitutional. The High Court ruled that the taxpayer’s challenge was vague, and the impugned provisions did not…
-
Jharkhand HC Allows State Authorities to Continue Proceedings, Rejects DGGI’S Arguments on Nationwide Fake ITC Fraud
The Jharkhand High Court recently adjudicated a writ petition where the petitioner had argued that only the authority which had initiated the entire process of investigation can complete the modalities and any subsequent actions by other authorities need…
-
Section 194N of IT Act, 1961 is Constitutional: Madras HC
The Madras High Court recently[1] upheld constitutionality of Section 194N of the IT Act, 1961. Section 194N inserted via Finance Act, 2019 was argued by the petitioners to be unconstitutional on the grounds of it being illegal, arbitrary, and…
-
An Ambiguous Circular: Is Electricity Indirectly under GST?
On 31.10.2023, CBIC issued a Circular clarifying the applicability of GST on certain services. The Circular, inter alia, clarified one issue which is the focus of this article. The issue, as framed by the Circular, was: Whether GST is…
-
Employment Includes Self-Employment: ITAT Interprets Section 6, IT Act, 1961
ITAT, Mumbai recently[1] interpreted the term ‘employment’ used in Explanation 1(a), Section 6, IT Act, 1961 and held that the term includes within its remit self-employment such as business or profession. ITAT relied on CBDT’s Circular and the Kerala…
-
ITC Can be Denied if Delay in Filing Returns: Cal HC
The Calcutta High Court recently decided the question whether an assessee filing its tax returns after the stipulated time – prescribed under Section 16(4), CGST Act, 2017 - is entitled to claim ITC. The High Court answered in…
-
Allahabad HC Clarifies Govt’s Scope of Power under Section 3 and 5, CGST Act, 2017
In a recent decision[1], the Allahabad High Court interpreted Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, 2017 and clarified the scope of power of the Central Govt and the CBIC under these provisions. Section 3…
-
Appellate Authority Ignored CBIC’s Circular: Bombay HC
In a recent decision[1] the Bombay High Court expressed surprise that the appellate authority ignored CBIC’s Circular while ordering the assessee to pay back the Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) refund granted to it along with interest. The…
-
The Din Surrounding ‘DIN’
The Supreme Court recently granted an interim stay on the Delhi High Court’s judgment wherein it was held that a communication issued by an income tax authority without citing the computer-generated Document Identification Number (‘DIN’) does not have…
