Delhi High Court
-
GST and IBC Overlap
-
GST and IBC Overlap: The Delhi High Court Takes a Prudent View
I. Introduction The Delhi High Court, in its recent judgment of Kanwal Chaudhary v IBBI & Ors held that when an advocate – registered under the Advocates Act, 1961 – provides services as an insolvency professional, the tax…
-
PMLA v IBC: The NCLAT Invokes Ganges and National Interest
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (‘NCLAT’) in Value Wise Consultancy Private Limited v The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement had to decide that when two legislations were in action- the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016…
-
A Small Note from Tax History: Entertainment Tax Dispute of Delhi Racing Club
Introduction In 2012, the Delhi Racing Club (‘Racing Club’) lost a tax dispute. The Government of National Capital Territory demanded payment of entertainment tax which the Racing Club unsuccessfully resisted. At first glance, the Delhi High…
-
IBC (Amendment), 2026 Series – IV | The Clean Slate Doctrine: Another Attempt at Laying Down the Law
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (‘IBC Act, 2026’) - inter alia - amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC’) to underline scope of the clean slate doctrine. IBC Act, 2026 is the second…
-
Amendments to the IT Rules, 2026: Effectuating the Tiger Global Case
On 31st March 2026, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’) notified amendment to two sub-rules of Rule 128, The Income Tax Rules, 2026 (‘IT Rules, 2026’). Reactions to the amendments are neatly divided: while a few…
-
Amendments to the IT Rules, 2026
-
Supreme Courts Uses Tax Sovereignty to Hunt Tiger Global
The Supreme Court recently handed a significant legal victory to the Income Tax Department (‘Revenue’) in The Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-Tax) & Ors v Tiger Global International III Holdings (‘Tiger Global case’). And in the process created…
-
Taxation of ESOP-Related Compensation: Reviewing the Flipkart Cases
Introduction In April 2023, the Board of Flipkart Private Limited (‘FPS’), Singapore decided to pay a one-time voluntary compensation - 43.67 US dollars per stock option - to all the option grantees of its Employee Stock…
-
Service Charge, its Similarity with Tax, and a ‘Double Whammy’ for Consumers: Some Thoughts
Introduction The Delhi High Court (‘High Court’) recently ruled that levy of mandatory service charge by restaurants violates customer rights. The High Court’s reasoning, anchored in consumer protection laws, termed a mandatory service charge as deceptive and misleading…
